Engram

MCA Module

Medicare Coverage Analysis, rebuilt.

From spreadsheet workflows to decision-grade analysis with traceability.

The problem with manual MCA

Traditional Medicare Coverage Analysis is a labor-intensive process that relies on spreadsheets, tribal knowledge, and inconsistent documentation. The result: slow turnaround, audit risk, and rework.

  • Manual line-by-line analysis across hundreds of procedures
  • Inconsistent application of coverage criteria
  • No traceability between decisions and source evidence
  • Weeks of analyst time for a single protocol
  • High risk of audit findings and compliance issues

How Engram's AI reasons across artifacts

The MCA Module applies structured reasoning to transform coverage analysis from an art to a science.

01

Ingest clinical artifacts

Upload protocols, budgets, CTAs, and billing grids. The system automatically extracts structured data from unstructured documents.

02

AI-powered analysis

Engram's reasoning systems analyze each procedure against Medicare coverage criteria, identifying coverage status, conflicts, and ambiguities.

03

Human review and decisions

Review flagged items, accept AI recommendations, override with rationale, and assign items for further review. Every action is tracked.

04

Export with traceability

Generate audit-ready deliverables with row-level rationale, evidence linking, and complete decision history.

What users see

The MCA Workbench provides a structured interface for reviewing coverage determinations, with flagged items, rationale panels, and decision tracking.

Procedure
Coverage
Status
Flags
CBC
Routine
Covered
None
MRI Brain
Research
Flagged
Conflict
ECG
Routine
Covered
None
CT Chest
Ambiguous
Review
Evidence needed
Labs Panel
Research
Not Covered
None

Rationale Panel

Coverage Determination

MRI Brain flagged for potential conflict between protocol requirements and Medicare NCD.

Evidence

Protocol Section 5.2, NCD 220.1

Suggested Action

Review with clinical team for final determination.

Outcomes

Measurable improvements in speed, consistency, and compliance.

Speed

70-85%

of procedures auto-classified, reducing analyst time from weeks to hours

Reduced rework

Consistent logic eliminates coverage determination variability across studies

Audit readiness

Every decision includes rationale, evidence linking, and complete audit trail

Transform your MCA workflow

See how the MCA Module can reduce coverage analysis time while improving consistency and audit readiness.